Explain detention of Mian Qayoom after expiry of PSA, SC asks J&K
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday asked the Jammu and Kashmir administration to explain the basis for detaining high court’s bar leader Mian Abdul Qayoom who has challenged his detention under Public Safety Act (PSA) since August 7 last year.
The top court asked it to take into consideration various aspects including Qayoom’s age, expiry of detention period and the COVID-19 pandemic.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Indu Malhotra posted the matter for July 23 after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for J-K, said that he needs 10 days time to consider various aspects.
We want to know on what basis you (J-K administration) would like to detain him in Delhi’s Tihar Jail. Moreover, his detention as per order has already expired,” the bench said.
At the outset, Mehta said he had not received the copy of the plea and sought time to reply to it.
Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for Qayoom, said the detention order was for a limited period, for around one year.
The bench said that was the reason it has issued notice on the plea during the last date of hearing.
Dave replied that he understands why the Solicitor General was uncomfortable and complained that the present matter was not listed despite specific directions of the court.
Justice Kaul told Mehta that firstly his detention period has expired and secondly his ideology remains the same.
Dave pointed out that Qayoom is 73 years old and should not be kept in Tihar jail.
In the current scenario of COVID-19 would you like to keep this petition pending, the bench told Mehta, who said that Qayoom’s ideology remained the same.
The bench said it understands all these issues but sometimes there are compulsions which need to be complied with.
It told Mehta that he should respond by next date considering Qayoom’s age, expiry of his detention order and the COVID-19 times.
On June 26, the top court had issued notice to the J-K administration and sought its reply on Qayoom’s plea challenging his detention order.
Qayoom has also sought a direction to shift him from Tihar jail here to central jail in Srinagar on medical ground.
He has challenged the May 28 order of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court rejecting his plea against his prolonged illegal detention under the PSA in jails outside the UT.
He said he is a Senior Advocate with more than 40 years’ standing at the Bar and has served as President of the J&K High Court Bar Association for many terms, including from 2014 till the present day.
Qayoom said he was detained on the intervening night of August 4th and 5th, 2019, under the provisions of Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure and thereafter, an order of detention under the PSA was passed against him on August 7, 2019.
He said that on August 8 he was taken to Central Jail, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, without any prior notice of intimation, where he was kept in solitary confinement.
He said the high court’s May 28 order is ex facie unsustainable in law as it is premised on “stale, irrelevant, remote, vague, imprecise and deficient” grounds of detention.
The impugned judgment and order concluded that most of the grounds in the detention order are somewhat clumsy which implies that the High Court too found them wanting. Placing reliance on the doctrine of severability as enunciated by this Court in Gautam Jain versus Union of India…the High Court then proceeds to uphold the detention order solely on one ground, his appeal said.
He said the high court makes it abundantly clear that the detention order has been upheld solely on one ground — the four FIRs dating back to 2008 and 2010, as enumerated in the detention order.